general even distribution

more updates on my widely-disregarded views on current affairs...

do you know what the most effective mass-brainwash tool is? sitcoms. but first, let's take a look at what identity marketing is, because i know for a fact that you don't know this, and i feel like it's my duty to tell you.

most women can relate to a character from sex and the city or desperate housewives, and women being the most susceptible to identity marketing, they relate to these characters to the extent that they tend to loose their identities to these fictitious characters and start acting like them. men do it too, we all do it. if an identifiable character smokes on screen, chances are, if you keep identifying with this character, you're going to start smoking too. this works even better if the character gets your dopamine running, i.e. makes you laugh/happy.

that leaves us with a simple formula:

pleasing character + funny = mind control

has anyone wondered why there're spin-offs of sitcoms flooding the market today? it's healthy (and recommended by 9 out of 10 doctors) not to be as paranoid as i am, so i'll just draw the fucking picture for you.

now, i don't want to attack sitcoms altogether, it works everywhere. have you ever wondered why devoted pink floyd fans tend to experiment with acid somewhere down the line? or why it's really hard to come across a bob marley fan who doesn't smoke weed? it's hard for us too, a lot of our heroes are drug users, but identity marketing in this case isn't a matter of mind control or cranial contortion (a phrase i just invented, thank me later), it's a way of being, un-enforced.

back to the fucking sitcoms. did you know that 80% of all americans against communism don't really know what it is? their argument lies solely on the militant rule of stallin and the cold-war tension (that was fake anyway) between the states and russia. a closer look at sitcom humour reveals snippets of anti-comunist dialogue laced together with other droning, bland humour, and consumer america swallows it, not knowing that the people that control the media are the same upper-one-percent that have benefited most from capitalism.

let's clarify here, in a nutshell.

communism: all resources belong to the commons to be shared.
capitalism: all resources sold to people with the ka-ching to make more ka-ching.

with the growing us defecit (and its effect on the indian economy) and global recession, what was the answer from the us senate to boost the economy? buy off 80% of a.i.g. whose control now lies in the hands of the entire us population. mass control of the national resources in the hands of the people. i see a pattern forming here. yes, the answer to the recession caused by the flaws in capitalism: communism. today is a living proof of the fact.

i think it's safe to say that i have owned ayn rand's again... wait... "owning", such a capitalistic dream. I HAVE CAUSED AYN RAND'S ASS TO BE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED TO THE PEOPLE BASED ON NEED!!!

peace!